Demand an independent, public-facing review of BBC editorial governance and accountability.
 

In late 2025, a serious editorial controversy surrounding the BBC’s Panorama programme triggered political backlash, public concern, a rare public apology from the BBC Chair and the resignation of senior BBC leadership.

At the time, the issue dominated headlines.

Now, attention is moving on but underlying questions have not been answered:

• How are major editorial decisions actually made inside the BBC?
• Who has power over those decisions and who holds them accountable?
• How is public trust protected when mistakes are made?

That is why this campaign exists.

It is about whether the BBC, a public institution funded by the public, is accountable enough, transparent enough, and independent enough to retain public trust.

This campaign is for:

• Viewers who care about impartial journalism
• Journalists who want to protect editorial independence
• Licence fee payers who expect accountability in return
• And anyone who believes public institutions should answer to the public , not just to themselves or to politicians

This is not a left-wing or right-wing issue. It is a democratic one.

WHAT WE ARE CALLING FOR

We are calling for an independent, public-facing review of BBC editorial governance that is:

• Truly independent of political, commercial, and internal BBC influence
• Transparent in both its process and its findings
• Able to examine how major editorial decisions are made
• Able to review how complaints and concerns are handled
• Focused on protecting impartial, factual journalism
• Designed to give the public a meaningful voice in oversight
• Structured to feed directly into the upcoming BBC Charter Review

This is about strengthening the BBC, not attacking it. Strong institutions require strong accountability.
 

Who is behind this:

This campaign is launched by Luke Tobin, CEO of Unusual Group, who believes that public trust in journalism and public institutions matters, and that trust requires more than internal reviews and quiet resignations.

As Luke puts it:

“This campaign is not anti-BBC and not anti-journalism. It is pro-trust. The BBC belongs to the public. That means the public must have a voice when trust is questioned and must not be forgotten when attention moves on.”

Senior BBC resignations have been positioned as accountability but they do not fix broken systems.

The BBC is paid for by the public. Accountability must follow.

Take action now

✍️ Sign the petition

📢 Share it

💬 Add your voice